0
0
India playing cricket against Pakistan — or not playing — has now become a bit of a circus. The will-they-won’t-they drama surrounding every potential encounter has reduced it to something of a farce. It’s almost like the plot of Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa — poor Shah Rukh Khan stuck in emotional limbo, much like the fans who never quite know whether to hope or move on. One moment, the match is on. The next, diplomatic tensions or logistical chaos pulls the plug. And then, somehow, at the eleventh hour, it’s back on again. Classic subcontinental chaos.
For the record, the recent veterans’ match between India and Pakistan had nothing to do with the BCCI. It wasn’t an official BCCI event in any way. So when some former Indian cricketers chose to opt out of the game, it was entirely their personal decision. The fear of social media backlash — amplified by the political and public sensitivities around any cricketing engagement with Pakistan — weighed heavily on them. And in the age of viral outrage, even retired players are understandably cautious.
In fact, even the BCCI wasn’t certain until the very last minute whether the match would actually take place. There was confusion, hesitation, and silence — until some quick behind-the-scenes negotiations finally got things moving. Only then did the India-Pakistan veterans’ clash happen, salvaged in the dying hours like a rain-hit ODI on DLS calculations.
At the heart of it all is a deeper irony: two teams with rich shared history and passionate fanbases, held hostage by everything but the game itself. What was once the most electrifying fixture in world cricket now exists in a strange purgatory — half politics, half nostalgia, and very little cricket.
Thank God for BCCI vice-president — or rather, the current power centre — Rajeev Shukla, who managed to pull off the diplomatic trick just in time. The Asian Cricket Council (ACC) initially decided to stage a crucial AGM in Bangladesh, which the Indian cricket board opposed. Thereafter, BCCI wasn’t in the mood to host the event at all till Shukla along with Ashish Shelar joined hands through a quickly scrambled online meeting to pace way for the India-Pakistan match.
Eventually, the Middle East has now been locked in as the neutral venue for the tournament, offering a workable solution that appeases all stakeholders. With the logistics falling into place and the power games momentarily settled, all seems to be well — at least for now.
Poor veteran cricketers — they must be thinking, “Why on earth did we say no to it?” Watching the match go ahead smoothly, with the spotlight shining bright, must sting a little. In hindsight, sitting out might not have been the masterstroke they thought it was.
Most surprisingly, the Indian government has always maintained a clear stance — a strict no to bilateral series with Pakistan, but no restriction when it comes to multi-nation events. So, why all the hullabaloo every time? The rules haven’t changed — the noise around them just keeps getting louder.
The game is above all players and Teams .However Politics , Diplomacy , Terrorist attacks on Indian Soil and justifiable Indias stance towards Pakistan has entered the cricketing relations domain now for more than a decade .With the Middle East being relatively closer to both India Pak , both the countries fan base being available , a sports uprising combined with events logistics and multi tournaments hosted over the years , Oman , Sharjah. Dubai , Abu Dhabi and now slowly KSA Cricket popularity and growth including hosting cricket will continue to grow and so will fill in the gap of India Pakistan matches hosting in the event of any ICC Match / tournament involving India Pak and India not agreeing to play on Pakistan soil for obvious reasons .Nobody especially in India would like Cricket to be interwined by Politics / Nationalism but India cannot support a nation which in their foreign policy militarily and domestic aim to attack India by preaching religious hate , intolerance and abet militant and terrorist attacks on India not once not twice but continued over years and decades .